Matters of life and death

By Charles Adler, QMI Agency

Thursday, February 09, 2012

 

Canadians have witnessed some of the most heinous crimes imaginable. Paul Bernardo. Russell Williams. Clifford Olson. Willie Pickton. Mohammad Shafia.

I don’t need to remind you why they’ve been locked up — it’s all too disgusting to put into mere words.

But you’re still paying for them. Keeping people in jail costs money. They still get a bed and meals and medical treatment when they need it, all funded by taxpayers.

The guilty Shafias will cost Canada $10 million.  

What do their victims get? I’ll let you answer that.

It’s been 36 years since the death penalty was abolished by — guess who? — then prime minister Pierre Trudeau.

With new poll numbers from Angus Reid showing majorities in favour of the death penalty across the country, it seems Canadians haven’t completely warmed up to the idea of not having it available.

Let’s take a look at some specifics from the recent Angus Reid poll.

One that interests me is, given the choice between the death penalty and life in prison, 50% of respondents chose the latter. I wonder what they would have said if Angus Reid had asked them if they’d want to put ropes in the prisoners’ cells, as Conservative Sen. Pierre-Hugues Boisvenu has suggested.

Also, 75% of respondents who said they were opposed to renewing the death penalty cited fears of wrongful conviction leading to execution as their reason. It’s happened before. There’s no 100% guarantee it would never happen again.

Is that enough to convince me the death penalty wouldn’t be appropriate in select cases when guilt is absolutely irrefutable? I’m afraid not.

But these are real Canadians with real concerns talking. I disagree with their arguments, but I can respect them.

Here’s one argument I can’t respect, from interim NDP Leader Nycole Turmel: “The death penalty debate has been closed in Canada for years.

“Why are the Conservatives reopening the whole debate?”

It wasn’t the Conservatives who reopened the debate. Prime Minister Stephen Harper didn’t stand up in the House of Commons one day to say, “Hey, let’s talk about a bill on the death penalty!”

This all started with the Shafia trial — the trial of so-called “parents” who sentenced their daughters to death for just acting like teenagers.

Boisvenu spoke out because his daughter Julie was a murder victim.

Can you blame him for wanting to see people like the Shafias suffer the exact same fate as his daughter, who never committed a crime?

Turmel is just disappointed because she knows now the debate is not over.

The majority of Canadians side with Boisvenu and the victims of the Williamses and Picktons and Shafias in this country.

You can’t rehabilitate people like them.

If these poll numbers do end up translating into legislation before the House of Commons, so much the better.

But to dismiss them as some Conservative ploy is utterly disrespectful to a majority of Canadians.

3 thoughts on “Matters of life and death

  1. Absolutely we need this death penalty back. What this comes down to I think, is the completely embarrassing societal problem of political correctness that some people have adopted. People are scared to stand up and say something that may be offensive to someone. We have all heard this before, but as we sit here and debate what is and isn’t offensive, people like the Shafias, the Pictons, the Willams get away with heinous crimes and we foot the bill. To the Quebec senator who came out and said criminals should be able to kill themselves, good for you. You are one of the few who are spearheading a movement to a better system of justice, at great personal sacrifice.

  2. many things need to be overcome, to see the death penalty reinstated. first we need to get rid of the leftwing criminals have rights too “bucketheads” that sit on their asses in ottawa, they “think” and are terrible at it and NEED TO STOP. may i suggest some of you morons seek out a head shrinker and a proctollogist to dislodge that nugget you call a brain and have it reinserted into your skull, versus your rectal cavity, where it currently resides. these pieces of walking compost should have been strung up immediately after all avenues of appeal were exsausted. speaking of course on bernardo, pickton olson. Conservative Senator Pierre-Hugues Boisvenu should be left alone, the un-named clown that publicly insulted the senator should stand in public and in front of cameras on a live public transmition to appologize for those comments, then resign from federal politics.

  3. …the death penalty. absolutely! what better way to send the message that killing is wrong than by, you know, killing people!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Disclaimer: The editor(s) reserve the right to edit any comments that are found to be abusive, offensive, or contain profanity.